Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Eelco Ubbels's avatar

The real return data from the two oil crises is the most useful historical anchor in this piece. Equities down 49% in real terms during the first crisis, bonds down 11%, gold up 238%. During the second, equities down 25%, bonds down 17%, gold up 285%.

The asset class hierarchy in a persistent energy-driven inflation regime is clear and consistent. From a SAA perspective, Alpha Research Capital Market Assumptions, updated April 1, 2026, price Gold at 4.45% annualised, identical to US TIPS and above Global Government Bonds at 4.04%. That pricing implies the market treats gold as an inflation hedge rather than a structural real return asset.

The 1970s data suggests the two are not the same thing: in a persistent inflation regime, gold did not hedge inflation, it dramatically outperformed it. The assumption that most challenges this scenario is the one the author correctly identifies: US energy independence. The 1973 and 1978 crises created direct consumer price shocks at the pump in a way that is structurally different today. That difference could compress the real return differential significantly even if the directional call is correct.

Federated Hermes notes that gold "remains a core diversifier in multi-asset portfolios during periods of stagflationary pressure," Federated Hermes, Asset Allocation Award winner 2026.

The question is whether the current episode is persistent enough to trigger the second leg.

Snaffie's avatar

Great as always. Thanks for your content.

There is an error though in the legend of the last graph. I guess the yellow line is gold.

No posts

Ready for more?